https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/issue/feed International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 2024-05-31T17:09:08+10:00 Tracy Creagh crimjournal@qut.edu.au Open Journal Systems <p>The <em>International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy</em> is an open access, blind peer reviewed journal that seeks to publish critical research about common challenges confronting criminal justice systems around the world.</p> <p>The global production of knowledge in the social sciences has been structurally skewed towards the Anglophone countries in the Global North (Connell 2007). Criminology as a field of knowledge, until recently, has had a highly selective focus on crime and violence in the large population centres of the Global North. The Global South is a concept that acknowledges the unequal relations of power that shape the lives of the current and formerly colonised, enslaved and dispossessed nations by imperial powers that dominated 9/10th of the world until recently (Carrington, Hogg, Sozzo 2016). It is not a geographic divide but an epistemological grid of power that has shaped social scientific knowledge.</p> <p>The Journal is committed to cognitive justice (de Sousa Santos 2014) and as such aspires to democratise knowledge, bridge global divides and encourage the voices of those on the periphery to publish with the Journal. This includes scholars from diverse Indigenous and first nations peoples communities, as well as scholars from the Global North and South committed to cognitive justice.</p> <p>Authors retain copyright and articles are licenced via Creative Commons to make published articles more readily available and useable. There are no APCs (Article Processing Charges). Authors can submit and publish at no cost.</p> <p> </p> <p>Carrington K, Hogg R and Sozzo M (2016) Southern criminology. <em>British Journal of Criminology </em>56(1): 1–20. <a href="http://doi.org10.1093/bjc/azv083">http://doi.org10.1093/bjc/azv083</a></p> <p>Connell R (2007) <em>Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge social science</em>. Crows Nest: Allen &amp; Unwin</p> <p>de Sousa Santos B (2014) <em>Epistemologies of the south: Justice against epistemicide. </em>Routledge</p> https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/2733 Building a Panopticon Through Nodal Governance: Mass Surveillance and Plural Policing in China’s COVID-19 Lockdown 2023-03-15T08:37:08+10:00 Qi Chen aliceqichen@gmail.com <p>At one time monitoring over 900 million people, China’s health code system is arguably the most controversial invention of the pandemic. This study explores how the system emerged and its implications for security governance in urban communities. By analysing 9,533 social media posts published during three key weeks, the study revealed that early pandemic responses in China were heavily shaped by private nodes, such as estate management companies, private security guards and homeowners. Homeowners’ demands for extra security clashed with migrants’ and tenants’ demands for mobility. The health code system was presented as a ‘solution’ to these conflicts. The findings of this study highlight the limitations of consumer-driven pluralisation in policing. Such pluralisation offered limited opportunities for democratisation. Instead, the radical pursuit of ‘club goods’ by consumer-denizens reinforced existing inequalities. Entrenched inequalities tempted marginalised social groups to accept ‘indiscriminate’ surveillance, which paved the way for a neo-panopticon. The study also warns against the alliance of state nodes and big-tech companies. Through collaboration, these powerful players can replace political dynamics in the community with data-driven modulation, thus destroying the foundation of nodal governance.</p> 2024-05-31T00:00:00+10:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Qi Chen https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/3076 Neo-Colonial Criminology 10 Years On: The Silence Continues 2023-08-17T12:36:36+10:00 Antje Deckert antje.deckert@aut.ac.nz <p>Decolonial academic discourse has gained substantial momentum since 2010, prompting the question of whether research on hyperincarcerated Indigenous peoples in settler-colonial societies has increased. Earlier research found a lack of engagement with this social problem in high-ranked criminology journals in the decade preceding 2010. This study focuses on the subsequent decade (2011–2020) to ascertain any discernible shifts. The discursive mass on hyperincarcerated populations (Indigenous, African American, Hispanic American) is determined, finding that it still fails to reach the critical mass required to mainstream the idea that most discussions of criminality cannot afford to remain colourblind considering lived realities. Publication-to-incarceration-rate ratios for hyperincarcerated populations are compared, finding that the relative silence regarding Indigenous peoples also continues. The study concludes that the surging decolonial debate had little effect on the quantity of topical research published in high-ranked mainstream criminology journals, calling for future research to investigate why and to address any qualitative changes.</p> 2024-05-31T00:00:00+10:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Antje Deckert https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/2950 The Theoretical Contributions of Asian Criminology in Reconstructing Criminology 2023-05-25T19:58:38+10:00 Pin Yu Yu_Pin123@163.com Jianhong Liu jliu@um.edu.mo <p>A recent primary development in criminology is a growing recognition that there has been Western domination in knowledge production and dissemination. The imbalance of knowledge in criminology is a significant weakness of the discipline. Prominent scholars have called for the decolonisation of criminological knowledge to correct this bias. Asian criminology and Southern criminology are the latest developments and promising forces in decolonising criminology (Liu 2018; Moosavi 2018). One of Asian criminology’s exceptional contributions to the current decolonisation movement is its significant theoretical achievements. This paper reviews theoretical efforts in Asian criminology and the theoretical innovation of the theoretical works, particularly those developed by Liu (Liu 2014; 2016; 2017; 2021a; 2022; 2023). It shows how theory development in criminology can gain insights from observations based on Asian contexts. The paper provides an update on these developments and their contributions to the reconstruction of criminology.</p> 2024-05-31T00:00:00+10:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Pin Yu, Jianhong Liu https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/3072 ‘“She Tells Me I'm Pushy” is More Likely than the Man Directly Admitting to Being Pushy’: Practitioners’ Views on Screening and Assessing Risk of Intimate Partner Sexual Violence 2023-10-13T14:44:08+10:00 Nicola Helps nicola.helps@monash.edu <p>Domestic and family violence (DFV) and sexual violence intersect, with sexual violence often perpetrated by an intimate partner alongside other forms of DFV. While DFV perpetrator interventions are commonly used in response to DFV perpetration, scant research has considered how these interventions identify and address sexual violence, including intimate partner sexual violence (IPSV). Drawing on the findings from an Australian study which involved a survey of 97 practitioners, this paper explores screening and risk assessment of IPSV within the DFV perpetrator intervention context. The research findings demonstrate limited screening and risk assessment of IPSV, particularly when compared to other forms of DFV. This demonstrates a clear need for focused attention on IPSV as part of broader efforts to hold perpetrators accountable for all forms of DFV.</p> 2024-05-31T00:00:00+10:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Nicola Helps https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/2989 Counting and Accounting for Mental Health Related Deaths in England and Wales 2023-05-31T06:15:34+10:00 David Baker David.Baker@liverpool.ac.uk Marta Fidalgo marta_racf@hotmail.com Lauren Harrison-Brant laurenjade1@live.com <p>This article examines how mental health related deaths (MHRDs) in England and Wales are counted and accounted for. Data collated by the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health (NCISH) constructs such deaths as being predominantly the result of suicide. This article examines 221 Reports to Prevent Future Deaths (PFDs) issued by coroners’ courts in relation to MHRDs. It establishes that in 49% of cases suicide is not recorded as the sole cause of death. The article also provides thematic findings that emerged from the qualitative analysis of these PFDs and identifies issues with errors or deficiencies in the provision of care (in 72% of cases), communication (55%) and policy (26%). The findings emphasise that organisational and structural issues contribute to deaths of people in connection with mental healthcare and that these deaths should not solely be considered suicides. The article raises significant questions about the accuracy of mortality data and the capacity of public organisations to learn lessons that might prevent future deaths.</p> 2024-05-31T00:00:00+10:00 Copyright (c) 2022 David Baker, Marta Fidalgo, Lauren Harrison-Brant https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/3130 Masculinities and the Lived Understandings of Bystander Responses to Everyday Violence 2023-10-06T12:28:27+10:00 Stephen Tomsen s.tomsen@westernsydney.edu.au <p>Among criminologists there has been an expanded contemporary interest in measures that encourage bystander intervention in the social settings of escalating and potentially violent incidents. These broadly include partner abuse and domestic disputes, as well as confrontational social interaction and other forms of targeted harassment and violence (racist, sexist, homophobic, ableist etc.), in everyday life. This article considers the likely success or failure of seeking to foster such measures as a core strategy of violence prevention, with discussion of the author’s Sydney-based study of the understandings of violence arising from young men’s lived experience of its various forms. It particularly concentrates on the results of focus groups conducted with a mixed sample of young men (aged 16-25 years) between 2018-2020. These participants had personal engagements with violence and potential violence, that shaped their reservations and doubts about regular intervention and general male anti-violence advocacy as reasonable and achievable social practices. </p> 2024-05-31T00:00:00+10:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Stephen Tomsen https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/2837 Eating E.T.: Carnism and Speciesism 2023-05-29T09:04:07+10:00 Ragnhild Sollund ragnhild.sollund@jus.uio.no <p>This article takes as its point of departure an event in which a plant-based version of the space alien, the Extra-Terrestrial (‘E.T.’), from the science fiction film bearing its name, was barbecued and served as a meal to participants at a conference. The soy dish produced different reactions: some laughed, while others seemed appalled. These different sentiments provide the basis for a broad green cultural criminology analysis of the traditions of meat-eating, tracing its role in human history and in the barbecue. The purpose of this is to explore why humans treat different categories of animals so differently. To understand the reactions the meal produced, the article addresses two contrasting aspects of the human–non-human animal relationship—‘carnism’ and ‘pet-keeping’—and contemplates these in relation to the reactions to eating E.T. The goal is to expand on the study of the human–animal relationship, particularly speciesism—understood as ideology and practice that legitimise and produce animal abuse through the analytical concept <em>categorical discriminatory speciesism.</em></p> 2024-05-31T00:00:00+10:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Ragnhild Sollund https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/3229 Lois Presser (2022) Unsaid: Analyzing Harmful Silences. Oakland, CA: University of California Press 2023-11-27T07:59:37+10:00 Lorenzo Natali lorenzo.natali1@unimib.it <p>Lorenzo Natali reviews <em>Unsaid: Analyzing Harmful Silences </em>by Lois Presser</p> 2024-05-31T00:00:00+10:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Lorenzo Natali https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/3305 Aaron Good (2022) American Exception: Empire and the Deep State. New York: Skyhorse Publishing 2024-01-08T12:44:40+10:00 Shane Miller shane.miller@soc.utah.edu <p>Shane Miller reviews <em>American Exception: Empire and the Deep State </em>by Aaron Good</p> 2024-05-31T00:00:00+10:00 Copyright (c) 2022 Shane Miller